Zinveo

The Structural Risk Intelligence For Foreign
Capital In Chinese Startups

The Chinese Startup You're Considering

What you want screened before your IC meets.

Your Deal Materials

Whatever documentation you already have.

Your Structural Concerns

What your IC can't answer from materials alone.

Your Investment Mandate

Your ticket size, stage, and risk parameters.

Direct Insights from Top University Researchers

Nanyang Technological UniversityTsinghua UniversityUniversity of CambridgeNational University of SingaporeThe Chinese University of Hong KongStanford UniversityHEC ParisSAIFUSC Marshall School of BusinessLondon School of EconomicsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityTsinghua UniversityUniversity of CambridgeNational University of SingaporeThe Chinese University of Hong KongStanford UniversityHEC ParisSAIFUSC Marshall School of BusinessLondon School of EconomicsShanghai Jiao Tong University

Structural Risk Calculator

What You Could Gain With ZINVEO

Structural risk
estimate

USD
deals / year
Capital screened
$50M
Structural rules applied
53
Deals likely flagged for review
7
Capital potentially exposed
$19.5M
Capital you save
$7.8M
Request Access

Illustrative estimate, not derived from ZINVEO's proprietary data. ZINVEO does not guarantee outcomes.

The Framework

Three Fixed Lenses. Applied To Every Deal, The Same Way.

Lens 01

Governance

Whether formal control, board seats, voting rights, protective provisions, actually matches who holds day-to-day authority.

Formal vs. effective control mapping

Company chop and legal representative structure

Board composition vs. real decision authority

Lens 02

Capital Dependency

Where a company's capital and revenue actually originate, and what that implies about incentive alignment.

Source and terms of state-linked or subsidy capital

Customer and revenue concentration analysis

Prior-round capital account and SAFE dependencies

Lens 03

Political Exposure

How exposed a structure is to shifts in regulation, enforcement, or policy posture, precedent versus untested assumption.

Foreign-ownership catalogue status by sub-sector

VIE structure enforceability and precedent

Cross-border data and capital movement exposure

Stress-Test

Validated Against Real Deal Documents

Three deals, three different fragility outcomes, demonstrating that ZINVEO distinguishes between structurally sound and structurally fragile deals with precision.

TutorLink

EdTech

Moderate
R13

35% subsidy-linked users

R7

70% voting vs 52% equity

R23

Independent director not tested

Policy-enabled demand not disaggregated from market-driven demand.

GreenHarvest

AgriTech

Elevated
R21

Undisclosed related-party distributor

R24

Board notice at contractual minimum

R10

Founder took over investor comms

Undisclosed RPT at 60% revenue concentration. Board authority illusion.

QuantumPay

Fintech

Critical
R26

Sole founder VIE instrument control

R8

Communications via legal counsel only

R29

2 competitor licenses suspended

Single point of failure on VIE, plus political stress signals concurrent with sector regulatory shock.

Illustrative examples, not based on any actual client engagement. Not a valuation, not a recommendation.

Quel problème pouvons-nous résoudre ensemble ?

Pour Gouvernance

Des sièges au conseil et des droits d'actionnaires qui semblent identiques à ce qu'on attendrait sur n'importe quel marché, jusqu'à vérifier qui détient réellement le contrôle opérationnel.

Explorer Gouvernance

Gouvernance

Catégorie de risque structurel

Règles structurelles Zinveo

See the framework applied to your next deal.

Recherchez dans notre couverture, ou demandez un accès direct au moteur de risque structurel de ZINVEO.